f𝕏rss
Thu, May 21, 2026|About|Contact|Sign In
NBANEWS
'I'm Not Sure If It Was Good, To Be Honest': SGA's Deadpan Postgame Take On Hartenstein
NBA|21 May 2026 3 min

'I'm Not Sure If It Was Good, To Be Honest': SGA's Deadpan Postgame Take On Hartenstein

By NBA News Staff

Asked about Isaiah Hartenstein's impact on Victor Wembanyama after the Thunder's Game 2 win, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander gave the postgame moment of the night: a flat, ad-libbed answer that he then had to walk back.

Key Takeaways

  • 1.Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals with 30 points and an MVP-level closing stretch as Oklahoma City beat the San Antonio Spurs 122-113 to even the series at one apiece.
  • 2.Now we got to go on the road against a really good team and go get one." He was more generous in praising the rest of the locker room for hitting back after the Game 1 loss.
  • 3.We just kept fighting, stuck with it, and we're able to pull out a W." Game 3 tips off in San Antonio on Friday night, with the Spurs still missing De'Aaron Fox and now potentially without rookie Dylan Harper after a collision with Chet Holmgren in the second quarter.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals with 30 points and an MVP-level closing stretch as Oklahoma City beat the San Antonio Spurs 122-113 to even the series at one apiece. He spent his postgame on-court interview with ESPN deflecting praise. Then he produced the comic moment of the night.

Asked by sideline reporter Lisa Salters to assess the impact of Isaiah Hartenstein, who had drawn the new primary assignment on Victor Wembanyama, Gilgeous-Alexander hesitated. "You all made a pivot defensively, hard on WBY. What kind of impact did Isaiah have tonight?" Salters asked.

"I'm not sure if it was good, to be honest," Gilgeous-Alexander replied, his face giving nothing away.

Salters tried again. "Break that down for me. Why was his impact not good?"

Gilgeous-Alexander appeared to register the question and immediately pivoted. "Say again? Break that down for me." Then, having bought a beat to recover, he course-corrected. "It was all right. It was good. It was good. We wanted to switch it up. Give them different looks. That's what it's about when you play against good players. You got to switch it up. Make sure the rhythm was not the same. And we did that tonight."

Salters could not help laughing. "Appreciate the honesty," she told him.

The MVP's two-step has already been seized on by Hoops Tonight, NBA on ESPN and the Chaz NBA YouTube channel as one of the most-discussed clips of the night, partly because it reads as a rare unfiltered moment from one of the league's most measured stars, and partly because the numbers backed up his impulse before his diplomacy. Hartenstein played 27 minutes after just 12 in Game 1 and, by Brian Windhorst's read on SC with SVP, single-handedly altered the physical profile of the series.

The rest of Gilgeous-Alexander's interview leaned into his usual restraint. After being told he had told teammates to calm down during one stretch even though he later described his own performance as "just okay," he shrugged. "I just try to get to something I'm used to getting to. I wasn't as efficient as I wanted to be down the stretch with my movements, my energy, but nonetheless, we got a W. It's all you can ask for. Now we got to go on the road against a really good team and go get one."

He was more generous in praising the rest of the locker room for hitting back after the Game 1 loss. "The guys brought it tonight knowing what it would have meant if we lost this one," he said. "We brought the energy from the jump. Guys are ready to play. Didn't get discouraged by the runs they made. Obviously, they're a good team. They're going to make runs. We just kept fighting, stuck with it, and we're able to pull out a W."

Game 3 tips off in San Antonio on Friday night, with the Spurs still missing De'Aaron Fox and now potentially without rookie Dylan Harper after a collision with Chet Holmgren in the second quarter. Hartenstein's role is the central tactical question of the series. Whether his head guard wants to publicly endorse the answer, the box score already has.